Mathematical gymnastics are not my forte . . ! We have a couple of decisions to make. If we are going to fit the panels in my car (and I think my old Audi can fit more into it than our other cars?) the panels need to be either 680mm wide by 2m high (with the passenger seat forward) or 880 wide by 1.8m high (width according to whether the perspex sheets are cut lengthwise in two or across in three, and includes 35mm each side for the frame.)
We still have the option of 5 sides instead of 6. The rotating light will fit easily inside either option, it is 1.5m high x 350mm wide x 150mm thick (I've taken the liberty of ordering one - $175, hope that's OK).
So, panels taller and thinner, or shorter and wider? Either way we will need 3 sheets of clear and 3 sheets of opal ($540 total) or may be able to do 3 clear and 2 opal and use some clear offcuts for our own backing using paper, or single layer of perspex or whatever. My brain has stopped here - Madgy??? or someone else who would like a puzzle to solve?
What would you prefer?
No comments:
Post a Comment